CSV reconciliation
Compare records using agreed identifiers; report mismatched amounts, missing matches, and duplicated keys instead of silently overwriting them.
PYTHON / DATA QUALITY / WORKFLOWS
Replace repetitive data handling with bounded, inspectable scripts. We define the inputs, confirm the business rules, and test the exceptions before calling a workflow complete.
A useful engagement starts with sample inputs, expected outputs, and the observable failure. We avoid claiming a fix before inspecting the evidence.
Compare records using agreed identifiers; report mismatched amounts, missing matches, and duplicated keys instead of silently overwriting them.
Pull or transform approved API responses; validate schemas, handle rate limits, and record actionable errors.
Normalize inputs and produce deterministic output files or defined KPIs with automated acceptance checks.
Sample files or response schemas, field definitions, matching policy, and explicit edge cases.
Readable Python source and configuration guidance, with dependency versions documented.
Positive/negative fixtures for duplicates, bad formats, missing keys, and error paths.
Run instructions, logging convention, limitations, and a rollback plan where relevant.
Evidence boundary: Exploratory browser demos on this site use synthetic data; they are not proof of a deployed customer automation. A proposed production integration requires approved access and a separate, bounded statement of work.
A scope review can use synthetic or redacted samples. Client material is not sent to external AI systems without authorization.
Not by default. Start with one verifiable workflow, then expand only after the existing output and failure cases are accepted.
Provide a short, sanitized description of the system, error symptoms, affected data, and desired output. Please do not submit passwords, private keys, or customer data through the public form.